Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16)

On 19 August 2014 15:09, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org> wrote:
> With a set of options
> it becomes much more clear when the client can start taking action
> without needing to worry about thrashing.

I think that I can concede that point.  It will make the ALTSVC frame
uglier, but that's fine.

> Additionally, how does a server remove/replace an ALTSVC record it set
> previously without waiting for a TTL expiration?

That's only a problem if you forget about one.

Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:10:00 UTC