W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:09:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW+QM8brr2FkBnOHAhFi9kjdrVoZ+yThckbURq9V5jmnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 19 August 2014 15:09, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org> wrote:
> With a set of options
> it becomes much more clear when the client can start taking action
> without needing to worry about thrashing.

I think that I can concede that point.  It will make the ALTSVC frame
uglier, but that's fine.

> Additionally, how does a server remove/replace an ALTSVC record it set
> previously without waiting for a TTL expiration?

That's only a problem if you forget about one.
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:10:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC