- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:01:28 -0700
- To: "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)" <robby.simpson@ge.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9 September 2014 07:10, Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management) <robby.simpson@ge.com> wrote: > Why is piggybacking of ACKs disallowed? We could thus save 9 octets, > particularly during the connection preface. I missed this earlier. There was a preference expressed for a clean demarcation between settings and acknowledgements. I don't think it was a strong preference, but since the only reason to allow piggybacking was to save bytes and that saving was for a relatively rare frame type, I think that it was easier to go with the no combination option.
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 16:01:56 UTC