Re: PRIORITY extension

On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Roberto Peon <> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <> wrote:
> In message <>, Patrick McManus
> writes:
> >> I keep hearing this argument over and over. Is the goal just to finish, no
> >> matter what?
> >
> >Of course not. But finishing is critically important.
> Absolutely, but the quality of the result is far more important
> than some arbitrary deadline.
> The most important part is deployment.
> This is true of transports and application-layer stuff.
> .. and we know it works when folks implement things properly, because we have experience in production with real, real-world use.
> The risk of getting it terribly wrong is low given this implementation experience.

What about the stream dependencies though? I assume you mean the experience is the simpler SPDY priority? 

The spec would be a hell of a lot simpler without this dep complexity, which is what I think scares people away (well that and the scary rfc comment). 

Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat

Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 23:01:01 UTC