Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552)


> Specifically, do we still need to copy static entries into the header set?
> My understanding of that aspect feature was to control the maximum size of
> the reference set for zero state implementations.  Now that there is no
> reference set and the header table has it's own explicit size limit, can we
> just let static references stay in the static table.

I think that the index for static table and one for dynamic table can
be separated. If we take such a design, HPACK implementation would get


Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 01:41:47 UTC