- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:37:52 +0000
- To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- cc: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CAOdDvNqqrqU-G3f7TuLDtY5+Pa1X=i0pzwv06fXcynwZQCOUVQ@mail.gmail.com> , Patrick McManus writes: >Some folks can't be bothered to generate running code or sometimes even comment >for much of that time; but that pattern persists in any group no matter the >term or the people (I too am guilty at times.) It was obvious from the start that this was a "goldplate SPDY" exercise and I know that I was not the only person who prioritized my time accordingly. If the process had started out with an open call to ask what the goals for HTTP/2 should be in the first place it would be different, but as it is, there suddenly existed a goal which was SPDY-shaped and an aggressive schedule which made sure that nobody else could challenge the obvious winner. Feel free to agree with me, but I've had this percetion from day one, and I have seen nothing that would make me change my mind. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 15:38:18 UTC