Re: Large Frame Proposal

> It adds state to the framing layer, but that’s not a layering violation. Using consecutive binary-format frames to express a single semantic frame, depending on the END_HEADERS flag, is a layering violation.

I agree, which is one reason I don't like the "emit reference set at
header block fragment with END_HEADERS" rule currently in the spec.

> Dynamic changes are unlikely to happen in practice; perhaps that should be disallowed.

I fear the they will happen frequently in practice, requiring dynamic
changes to the frame encoder/decoder. In practice they will likely be
driven by what is seen at the HTTP layer (large uploads/downloads,
file-transfer, etc).

Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 03:02:08 UTC