- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:39:14 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 22:39:42 UTC
While I have not yet discussed this with all the contributors, I have removed the WINDOW_UPDATE from the current proposal. On 8 July 2014 15:31, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > On 8 July 2014 14:35, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think that the arguments you've presented to the working group on >> this general subject would support the idea that the setting is >> sufficient. >> > > I do believe you are correct! I'll confer with my fellow > co-conspirators and see if we can agree to remove this from the proposal. > > cheers > > > > > -- > Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> > http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that > scales > http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd. > -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 22:39:42 UTC