- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:45:26 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <20140716054520.GC14304@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:52:35PM +1000, Greg Wilkins wrote: >The problem I'm seeing with this change is that you need one extra-byte to >send litteral headers fields that are not present in the static table. Maybe >on the other hand it rarely happens that they're not in the static table ? Sounds like a good way to persuade people to not create new headers all the time :-) Which reminds me: Should we fold "X-Forwarded-For" to "Forwarded-For" as part of the compression ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 08:50:26 UTC