Re: Large Frame Proposal

On 10 Jul 2014, at 10:40 am, Roberto Peon <> wrote:

> Lets assume that we're OK with larger frame sizes.
> At that point the question becomes: How large should the length field be?
> Imho, 64k for a frame is plenty large: 2048 frames/gig seems cheaply doable.
> I've said it elsewhere, in other ways but:
> I'm down with a larger max framesize (within limits: I feel that even 2^24 is pushing it).
> I'm supportive of a setting for max framesize.

There's another aspect here -- if we have larger frames, are people OK with the max frame size becoming the effective ceiling on compressed header block size, because CONTINUATION is ditched in the process?


Mark Nottingham

Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 00:47:43 UTC