- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:52:07 +0100
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 27 Sep 2014, at 8:09 am, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 04:51:50PM +0100, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/578> >> >> This hasn?t seen much discussion on list, and no one seems to have complained about it beyond Jeff. >> >> Does anyone want to argue for changing this, or should we WONTFIX? > > I think that if there are strong opinions in both directions, it deserves > being still studied openly. It's just a matter of encoding, variations are > possible (I proposed one some time ago, I don't know if it would have > addressed both usages). I think the time for that has truly past; most of our implementers want to get this out the door and running, not do another round of R&D. Jeff, you said “FWIW” — were you just telling us how you feel, or that you really think this needs to change? In the latter case, we can do a call for consensus. Regards, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 27 September 2014 17:52:35 UTC