W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting it out the door. Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:59:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_iQ=RBOoGAXqjKVomeT5jUGav8A1tcVjOOeYM-vAcmWDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Strange. I find quite the opposite.
>  Re-arranging the order of a fixed sequence of struct members or
> parser calls to fill them is far easier than implementing a whole
> management mechanism to cope with static table ID changes every time a
> header is parsed or scheduled to be written to a connection.
>

A management mechanism? i.e. index = staticTableIndex + headerTable.length?
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 23:00:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC