- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:45:12 +1000
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Greg, See: https://httpwg.github.io/wg-materials/ietf90/IETF90_draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol.pdf https://github.com/httpwg/wg-materials/blob/gh-pages/ietf90/minutes.md#draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol Cheers, On 20 Aug 2014, at 10:40 am, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > Mark, > > Is there a specific use-case motivating this additional header? ie are there situations that a proxy can use this to do more than just log/debug a tunnel? > > I'm certainly not opposed to having the additional information that this header provides, but I'd like to know what advantage there is for a client to include the header. If there is none, then it is not likely to be sent. > > cheers > > > > > > -- > Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> > http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales > http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:45:42 UTC