Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard

• From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
• Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:43:19 +1200
• To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <53D5E2F7.6060303@treenet.co.nz>

On 28/07/2014 2:40 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> In Toronto, we discussed moving RFC7238 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7238> from Experimental to Proposed Standard, now that it is implemented in most browsers.
> 
> The WG in the room seemed to think that doing so is a good idea; anyone here have a reason to believe otherwise?
> 
> See also:
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-http-status-code-308-ps/
> 

I support this.

Amos

Received on Monday, 28 July 2014 05:43:57 UTC