W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:25:59 +0200
Message-ID: <53D29327.20205@gmx.de>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
CC: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-07-25 19:22, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <53D2597B.7020909@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>> On 2014-07-25 06:59, Michael Sweet wrote:
>>> HTTP Upgrade
>>
>> And it couldn't have been "OPTIONS /"?
>>
>> There's nothing else in HTTP/1.1 that requires as many exceptions and
>> special cases as the asterisk form... Cost/benefit etc.
>
> Drop OPTIONS from HTTP/2, it's not worth the trouble.

That would break CORS and some uses of WebDAV.

OPTIONS is not the problem, "*" is.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 25 July 2014 17:30:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC