W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:32:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CANV5PPUAYUQcioJriJTHzEF-oXm8EBCEuE93nc-3D5nn+rBg8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> http://staff.psc.edu/mathis/MTU/limits.html :
>
>  IPv6 - The extended length option provides for a 32 bit length field,
> supporting packets up to 4294967295 bytes.
>

With the operative words there being "extended" and "option". So why can't
we do this in an extension, again?
--
Peace,
  -Nick
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 17:33:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC