- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 11:03:41 +0200
- To: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Mar 1 juillet 2014 08:30, William Chan (陈智昌) a écrit : > Try not to be too combative here :) I specifically caveated CONTINUATION > with an "If we think servers need to at least be able to support reading > continuation frames." In this thread, I'm not trying to debate the > controversial stuff. I'm just trying to get a list of the stuff we have a > relatively strong consensus around and how we keep those usable. Well speaking as an intermediary operator here, your list of "healthy" things to do just about convinced me http2 is going to be a major mess with some actors gaming the system just because they can, and I'd be better off blacklisting it wholesale rather than pay people to understand the security implications of those games. Security is expensive Complexity is expensive Most of us do not have Google's budget to play with those When your Internet flows have more operational consequences for your employer than a skipping youtube video you do not play those games. http1s MITM looks better from an operational POW every day. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 09:04:27 UTC