- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:16:57 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <4DD79E4D-6340-4181-BB20-E981D280CCFB@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >At this point I'm concerned enough about getting through our security >review that I'm inclined not to do this; the possible benefit (which >the WG seems open to, if not enthusiastic about) doesn't appear to be >worth the risk (both that to the actual security of people using the >protocol, and the risk of not making it through our security reviews). I would like to have some idea about the compression gain before we make up our mind. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 14:17:31 UTC