- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:43:34 +0000
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAH_y2NFna2Gh9=su5q7PsmcR+n_XizTXY-aVt4CmsHdr5u5uVQ@mail.gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins wri tes: >So on this data we should go with h2-12-noRefSet-noCopy-static1 Sounds good to me. Can I persuade you do a run of h2-12-noRefSet-noCopy-static1 where headers which contain only a timstamp compresses to 5 bytes, so we can see if "algorithmic compressors" are worth looking at ? As I remember, it's these five headers: Date: Expires: Last-Modified: If-Modified-Since: If-Unmodified-Since: A more comprehensive algorithm would also reach for timestamps in cookies etc. but don't worry about that for now. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 08:50:25 UTC