W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 priority

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:45:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7Rbca_XRW+pUaFoPpHb7e2wD6z-EwC+zivV3KSx+27cTPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
+1 to the notion of moving priority out of the http2 doc and into a
separate document.

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
>
> On 3 September 2014 09:43, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
>>
>> I would really appreciate it if folks would stop hijacking my threads
>
>
> Sorry my bad: anticipating failure again.
>
> On the substance of this thread, I agree that an optional priority should
> not be part of headers frame.  We've not yet implemented priorities but are
> interested in experimenting with their use.   Happy for the detail to be
> moved to appendix or other document.
>
> regards
>
> --
> Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
> http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 00:45:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC