- From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:23:37 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- CC: Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, "William Chan (?????????)" <willchan@chromium.org>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Presumably nothing -- the 502 carries END_STREAM, so the server is (at least) half-closed from the server side. The connection is still valid, because HPACK processed all the input, it just stopped emitting anything. -----Original Message----- From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w@1wt.eu] Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 2:10 PM To: Jeff Pinner Cc: Johnny Graettinger; William Chan (?????????); Jason Greene; HTTP Working Group Subject: Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 02:04:16PM -0700, Jeff Pinner wrote: > > In 1.1 it would return 502 bad gateway. In 2.0, assuming I manage to > > implement it to the server, I don't expect it to be able to > > multiplex multiple streams over a single connection before we've > > finished HTTP/3. I'm serious. 2.0 is a major architecture change for > > low-level intermediaries. So I'd say that for now, with the elements > > I have, a protocol error on 2.0 will be handled the same way as in > > 1.1 : the connection will be torn down and the effects will be exactly the same : only the request using that connection will be impacted. > > What we do: > > 1) HPACK is configured to stream headers and discard all headers above > a certain side (see github.com/twitter/hpack decider maxHeaderSize). > 2) The reverse proxy aggregates the response headers and if it they > have been truncated (because they were above the max size) it responds > with a 502. But what do you do then with the server connection and/or stream when you send the 502 to the client ? Willy
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 16:24:08 UTC