Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation.

True, though not likely useful.
-=R


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> In message <CAP+FsNesMqqDa+QyV_c_sg8fud=DPi0PqxGG=
> W5nLV2_CS1hsg@mail.gmail.com>, Roberto Peon wri
> tes:
>
> >Unfortunately not true-- the backend can't have the same compressor state
> >as the proxy unless the proxy is doing a 1:1 connection mapping (which
> only
> >happens sometimes).
>
> If the backend compresses without relying on the state it can (ie: static
> set and huffman all the way)
>
> It obviously gives inferior compression, but it will work.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>