- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:38:56 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 17 Jul 2014, at 3:58 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 July 2014 08:02, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> Notice that I'm proposing a unsigned 32 bit, to be Y2038 >> compliant. > > I realize that it's going to be less efficient, but the regular HPACK > numeric encoding with a 0-bit prefix will be more regular (and not > need the string exception). At a cost to regularity. > > This is a slippery slope; are we really going there? No, we already had consensus here, and I don't see any new information. Regards, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 04:39:26 UTC