- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:42:46 +0000
- To: K.Morgan@iaea.org
- cc: jgraettinger@chromium.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <2CB8608F-B0AC-4ECD-AEFF-9B5A1AE870CA@iaea.org>, K.Morgan@iaea.org writes: >On 14 Jul 2014, at 23:03, "jgraettinger@chromium.org" <jgraettinger@chromiu= >m.org> wrote: >> >> I'm not that interested in talking about lightbulbs. These use cases can = >appropriately be covered by h2-lowprofile / h2-c, and I've no objection to = >a 256 byte default and minimum in that context. > >+1 for different profiles -1 for different profiles. Show us the need before fragmenting the protocol. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 21:43:10 UTC