W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553)

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:42:46 +0000
To: K.Morgan@iaea.org
cc: jgraettinger@chromium.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <52378.1405374166@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <2CB8608F-B0AC-4ECD-AEFF-9B5A1AE870CA@iaea.org>, K.Morgan@iaea.org writes:
>On 14 Jul 2014, at 23:03, "jgraettinger@chromium.org" <jgraettinger@chromiu=
>m.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not that interested in talking about lightbulbs. These use cases can =
>appropriately be covered by h2-lowprofile / h2-c, and I've no objection to =
>a 256 byte default and minimum in that context.
>
>+1 for different profiles

-1 for different profiles.

Show us the need before fragmenting the protocol.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 21:43:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC