Re: Large Frame Proposal


On 8 Jul 2014, at 12:06 pm, Michael Sweet <> wrote:

> Mark,
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Or at least one issue that the fixed max frame size cannot be tuned for any reason
>> That's a design decision that was made a long time ago. To reconsider it, I need more than vague concerns that amount to "I don't like it"; I need concrete problems that it causes.
> For printing 16k frames/chunks cause a 2x performance drop.  And for video streaming you'll likely see similar issues (and stuttering) due to the volume of data involved. (see my other post on the subject)

Out of curiosity - are your use cases *actually* using HTTP/2, or are you assuming some mapping of IPP to HTTP/2?


Mark Nottingham

Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 04:10:34 UTC