W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:27:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUVdDFYDBSfsaGGE1MN0taT-dsQdB1Nj5i6N-U_ex2YgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 11 July 2014 13:23, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> I mean that if we insist the entire header-set goes into a single
> frame at most *zero* set of headers can be incomplete at any point
> in time.

That's a valid point, though I was considering the fact that you have
to read/buffer/process that frame, which takes non-zero time.  The
point being that whether it's 0 or [0,1), this is very much different
to N.
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 20:28:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC