Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes

On 15 July 2014 01:26, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> +1 for no 1xx.

I'll note here that we've pushed a number of other things to
extensions.  Things that have use cases even.  1xx uses - or the
examples of these that we actually have - tend to be things that map
to HTTP/2 framing layer constructs.

With extensions, I think that we can provide for the potential uses
that 1xx codes were previously used for.  And I think that enabling
the functionality in this way is architecturally cleaner than
propagating the specific mechanism from HTTP/1.1.  1xx fits the
HTTP/1.1 architecture, but not HTTP/2.

> +1 for removing trailers.

It has always been marginal.  I've not seen a whole lot of support for
retaining them, but no one has really pushed hard.  Maybe you can try.

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 17:26:52 UTC