Re: Large Frame Proposal

In message <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC201187E9618@SEM002PD.sg.iaea.org>, K.Morgan@iaea.org w
rites:

>Amen. A 31-bit frame-length field may be too many bits today, but IMO we 
>shouldn't set ourselves up for an ugly hack later.
>
>So I propose some variant of the following...
>
>  0                   1                   2                   3
>  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>|   Reserved    |                  Length (24)                  |
>+-+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+

Works for me.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 10:18:32 UTC