- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:09:43 -0700
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 24 July 2014 06:52, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > The recipient of that 1.1 request is supposed to assume path value of > "/" in these cases not "*". The link Kari provided shows that there is an exception for OPTIONS requests in the absolute form that address an HTTP URI with path-empty form. https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/specs/rfc7230.html#rfc.section.5.3.4 That seems pretty explicit to me. Maybe you can look at the editor's draft and see if my latest tweaks have corrected this.
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 14:10:11 UTC