- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:47:38 +1000
- To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I've heard that Johnny is out of the office, so we shouldn't expect an immediate response. My understanding is that a week (or even a few weeks) would be asking for a lot here. Furthermore, it looks like we wouldn't get access to the raw data, just his summary. On 16 Jul 2014, at 4:54 pm, Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> wrote: > On 16 July 2014 03:31, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> What do people think of this proposal? >> >> So far, my reading of the WG is that we want to get rid of the reference set, and are just talking about the details of how to do so. > > Myself and a few others are hesitating here. Roberto and Johnny have > both suggested that they believe the reference set _is_ helpful, and I > believe Johnny is collecting data to prove the point. I'd like to be > forward-looking where we can, so I'm inclined to want to wait a week > or so to see what data Johnny can collect. > > Is that problematic from the perspective of our timetable? -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 23:48:07 UTC