- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:13:58 +0200
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- CC: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, William Chan <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Jesse Wilson <jesse@swank.ca>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-07-02 13:30, Mike Belshe wrote: > ... > There is no real discussion of HTTP/3. PHK proposed HTTP/3 discussion > as a bucket to catch the same arguments that he lost in HTTP/2 > discussions. As far as I can tell, he is the only one talking about it. > The rest of us are still working on HTTP/2. > ... Actually, the term "HTTP/3" as the thing we may or may not do after HTTP/2 has come up a lot. In HTTP/2 we were constrained both by charter (being able to convert from/to 1.1) and the proposal we started with (and the audience pushing for it). I hope that in future work we'll work on issues *other* than performance again. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 12:14:44 UTC