- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:41:25 +1000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 13:41:57 UTC
On 16 July 2014 16:43, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > Can I persuade you do a run of h2-12-noRefSet-noCopy-static1 where headers > which contain only a timstamp compresses to 5 bytes, so we can see if > "algorithmic compressors" are worth looking at ? > I just did a quit hack to use the literal with indexed name encoding, but that detects the five date headers. The value is then just sent as 5 bytes. But the savings were good: HPACK/HEADER TABLE01024409616384h2-1264.22%47.06%42.18%41.82%h2-12-noRefSet 64.22%47.39%42.57%42.44%h2-12-noRefSet-noCopy64.22%47.16%42.50%42.67% h2-12-noRefSet-noCopy-static164.22%47.18%42.36%40.97% h2-12-noRefSet-noCopy-static1-date553.62%39.48%34.99%33.62% So that's a 6-10% saving, which is lots more than any other feature we are discussing here. So worth looking into! cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 13:41:57 UTC