W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 23:24:35 +0000
To: <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, <gregw@intalio.com>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0D7E81BD-CB31-4AD3-8C18-32F88B94FB05@iaea.org>

>>> I think per-stream settings are missing in the current draft

>>Whether you agree or not, that is entirely intentional.

>I originally had an idea to have stream groups, but found it unworkable.

Hold on, we do already have pseudo per-stream settings. Even if you don't call it a per-stream setting, each stream has it's own flow control window that's set at stream begin by SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE.

Perhaps it would be better to say SETTINGS_INITIAL_MAX_FRAME_SIZE, but I hardly think keeping a second integer for each stream is "complex". Yes, it adds more state, but it is optional.

This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 23:25:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC