W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

RE: PRIORITY extension

From: Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo) <rwheeldo@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:56:40 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0566CA5E9B906D40B6737DD47DA9FB8F1B547C70@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
 > A multiplexed protocol doesn't work without prioritization.  Or rather, it ends up worse than what we currently have.

Why? You still get compression which implies less data on the wire and fewer connections meaning fewer resources (memory, entropy, IO) needed and a reduced impact of slow-start.

It might be suboptimal but I don't get "worse than what we currently have".


Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 10:57:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC