- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:19:45 +0000
- To: Kinkie <gkinkie@gmail.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CA+Y8hcPt1RZfhV3NmqiPdmfNN_=nSn1v_KOrpGiZ1UYJBu_g4A@mail.gmail.com> , Kinkie writes: >On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote: >> Generally I think this is unnecessary - HTTP depends on "reliable" transport (TCP as defined) so we probably don't need this for frames generally. > >To me the most obvious advantage is not about data corrupted/lost by >transport, but in rapid detection of buggy http2 implementations in >peers. +1 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 14:20:14 UTC