W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: #555: frame synchronization

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:19:45 +0000
To: Kinkie <gkinkie@gmail.com>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <36750.1405952385@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CA+Y8hcPt1RZfhV3NmqiPdmfNN_=nSn1v_KOrpGiZ1UYJBu_g4A@mail.gmail.com>
, Kinkie writes:
>On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:
>> Generally I think this is unnecessary - HTTP depends on "reliable" transport (TCP as defined) so we probably don't need this for frames generally.
>To me the most obvious advantage is not about data corrupted/lost by
>transport, but in rapid detection of buggy http2 implementations in


Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 14:20:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC