W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:56:24 +0000
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <32701.1405446984@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABP7RbeGA3vVzFXrdPVjYBwuLWixs2FaSLecJe6gSCtQ-bK2Qw@mail.gmail.com>, James M Snell wr

>Regarding the privacy claims specifically, there's
>are a ton of things someone can learn given nothing but the method and
>routing information. Let's not fool ourselves into thinking that even
>the most rudimentary activity information is somehow "safe" from

My point is that a lot of that information is already leaked by TLS
and by carefully choosing to leak a little more, we may be able to
protect the rest a lot better.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 17:56:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC