Re: h2 padding

In message <>
, Brian Smith writes:
>On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
>> What do people think of Roy=E2=80=99s subsequent proposal to have a separ=
>ate padding frame and always send it? Please be aware that changing the pad=
>ding scheme would necessitate another round of security review.
>Consider an implementation that sends every frame in its own TCP
>packet, perhaps with a 1 minute delay between frames. [...]

If this was a joke, you forgot the smiley.

If it wasn't, please explain why we should even think about entertaining
the convenience of such an implementation, when 3/4 of the browsers
cannot even think of a reason to support non-TLS traffic.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 06:34:57 UTC