- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:52:35 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 03:53:03 UTC
Martin, static1 was simply switching the indexes so static indexes are 1-61, dynamic are 62-. It was not the proposal to create an extra static bit, but is much the same as 7+ allows 126 one byte values, so the first 64 dynamic entries are 1 byte only. No change to the literals. If they use a static name then they index the static table as 1-62. If they are an indexed literal, then a header table entry is created and the field will have a field index >61 when next used. cheers On 16 July 2014 13:25, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 15 July 2014 19:13, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > >> h2-12 == the HPACK used by draft 12 of HTTP >> noRefSet == no Reference Set >> noCopy == Do not copy static fields to the header table >> static1 == Static indexes are 1-61, dynamic are 62-... >> > > Does this mean two different ways of referencing the static table? Or are > you adding the flag for name references in literals as well? > -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 03:53:03 UTC