Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched

On 9/27/14, 1:12 AM, "Amos Jeffries" <> wrote:

>On 27/09/2014 10:01 a.m., Matthew Kerwin wrote:
>> On 27/09/2014, Greg Wilkins <> wrote:
>>> I'm still very much in favour of the switch.  It has resulted in
>>> good code simplications and enabled several optimisations.
>>> I understand Jeff's concern, but essentially one size doesn't fit
>>> all and I think Jeff's use-case is not the norm.   But even for
>>> Jeff's usecase, h2 headers should be far better than h1.
>> +1

+1 - I think this boils down to the use of standard headers vs. custom
headers.  For my use cases, standard headers are more common and so I
prefer them to have lower indices.

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 00:53:48 UTC