W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched

From: Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management) <robby.simpson@ge.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:53:23 +0000
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D04F76ED.3A8BA%Robby.Simpson@GE.com>
On 9/27/14, 1:12 AM, "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

>On 27/09/2014 10:01 a.m., Matthew Kerwin wrote:
>> On 27/09/2014, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
>>> I'm still very much in favour of the switch.  It has resulted in
>>> good code simplications and enabled several optimisations.
>>> 
>>> I understand Jeff's concern, but essentially one size doesn't fit
>>> all and I think Jeff's use-case is not the norm.   But even for
>>> Jeff's usecase, h2 headers should be far better than h1.
>>> 
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>
>+1.

+1 - I think this boils down to the use of standard headers vs. custom
headers.  For my use cases, standard headers are more common and so I
prefer them to have lower indices.
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 00:53:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC