- From: Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management) <robby.simpson@ge.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:53:23 +0000
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9/27/14, 1:12 AM, "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: >On 27/09/2014 10:01 a.m., Matthew Kerwin wrote: >> On 27/09/2014, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: >>> I'm still very much in favour of the switch. It has resulted in >>> good code simplications and enabled several optimisations. >>> >>> I understand Jeff's concern, but essentially one size doesn't fit >>> all and I think Jeff's use-case is not the norm. But even for >>> Jeff's usecase, h2 headers should be far better than h1. >>> >> >> +1 >> > >+1. +1 - I think this boils down to the use of standard headers vs. custom headers. For my use cases, standard headers are more common and so I prefer them to have lower indices.
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 00:53:48 UTC