W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:52:37 +1200
Message-ID: <53BE8C95.1070704@treenet.co.nz>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 10/07/2014 10:18 p.m., Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> K.Morgan@iaea.org writes:
> 
>> Amen. A 31-bit frame-length field may be too many bits today, but IMO we 
>> shouldn't set ourselves up for an ugly hack later.
>>
>> So I propose some variant of the following...
>>
>>  0                   1                   2                   3
>>  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> |   Reserved    |                  Length (24)                  |
>> +-+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> 
> Works for me.
> 
> 

WFM.

Amos
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 12:53:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC