W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 header field names

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:53:16 +0200
Message-ID: <54080C5C.2050109@gmx.de>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-09-03 21:36, Martin Thomson wrote:
> ...
>     Characters in header field values that are not valid according to the
>     "field-content" rule (see [RFC7230], Section 3.2), SHOULD be percent-
>     encoded before translated into HTTP/1.1 header field values.
>
> I hate using SHOULD, but it seems like if I made that a MUST, it would
> be immediately ignored.
> ...

Wait! Percent-Encoded?

If we can't transport the field value, we really shouldn't alter it in 
a way the recipient isn't going to understand (reminder: percent 
encoding isn't really a feature of field values!).

SO I think it would be much better to reject these, optimally on the 
HTTP/2 layer as well.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 06:53:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC