W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?)

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 20:38:10 +0000
To: Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>
cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <27500.1405111090@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAEn92TqdnReeqJxdNGvzX7N+yK1GbmGM-M5MCP-otS_KFbucRg@mail.gmail.com>, Johnny Graetting
er writes:

>> I mean that if we insist the entire header-set goes into a single
>> frame at most *zero* set of headers can be incomplete at any point
>> in time.
>
>False. Just because I declare a frame size doesn't mean I have to send all
>of it.

If you ever want to use the connection for anything else, you'll have to.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 20:38:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC