Re: CRLF requirement

On 01 Jul 2014, at 17:05, Anne van Kesteren <> wrote:

> That is not what happens in the most popular clients today.

Iím still curious why you think thatís relevant.

Browsers are soup-tolerant because they compete, among other things, on soup-tolerance.
That doesnít turn soupiness into a general recommendation in a protocol specification.

Iím much more interested in data that shows that any bare-CR problem is still extant in the wild, than data that shows traces of somebody thinking a long time ago that it might be a good idea to guard against such a problem, might it ever occur.

GrŁŖe, Carsten

Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 15:30:29 UTC