- From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:54:13 +1000
- To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 08:54:41 UTC
On 28 August 2014 18:21, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > Note that this is a straight copy of RFC7238: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-00.txt > > > > Please review the document carefully, and comment on this list. > > It is not a straight copy of RFC7238. For example, it contains the > statement "This specification contains no technical changes from the > experimental RFC 7238, which it obsoletes." > > It would be good to see a diff from RFC7238 to this draft, to see what > other changes there are. > > Is that not precisely what the quoted link is? Apart from pagination. https://gist.github.com/phluid61/de2eb744346c76d6814f -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 08:54:41 UTC