Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation.

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:32:40PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hey Willy,
> 
> Roberto isn't making a latency argument -- it's an argument for minimal
> buffering in the optimistic case(s).

But that was based on the fear of adding latency on slow links if the
headers are buffered.

Cheers,
Willy

Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 05:38:14 UTC