Re: Large Frame Proposal from Jeff Pinner on 2014-07-09 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 20:02:13 -0700
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Cc: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_ixUf9nqB2D+V1zV2eo7Jrw773shK6K08SP6g0-b67JtA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
>
> On 9 July 2014 12:35, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dynamic changes are unlikely to happen in practice;
>
>
> If the proposal is accepted, Jetty is definitely planning on modifying our
> server to adjust the frame size setting to a large value when we see a
> single large upload on a request.
>
> We will do the same for our client for downloads.
>

Precisely why I am a strong -1 on this proposal.

Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 03:02:40 UTC