- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:39:11 +1000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 03:39:39 UTC
I've pushed some fixes to a few editorial issues in the proposal identified by Martin https://github.com/gregw/http2-spec/commit/b55765fc173823da1e515ec653604d9cea6ce820 cheers On 8 July 2014 13:23, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > On 8 July 2014 10:58, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > >> That's a design decision that was made a long time ago. To reconsider it, >> I need more than vague concerns that amount to "I don't like it"; I need >> concrete problems that it causes. > > > insert Michael Sweets use-case here. > > cheers > > > > -- > Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> > http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that > scales > http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd. > -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 03:39:39 UTC