W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 19:40:00 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6361.1405712400@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABkgnnXeKqD6Z5Hm95AcCSP3+zY9VL-v4ChOta+GnTXmfw-7og@mail.gmail.com>
, Martin Thomson writes:

>We do already have that capability.

As far as I remember, only with respect the the reference set,
not with respect to the dynamic set ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 19:40:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC