- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:36:49 +1000
- To: Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>
- Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 22:37:18 UTC
On 8 July 2014 04:48, Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org> wrote: > Let's please not conflate the issue of large headers with video +1 I actually think that if you asked those that server video, they are not likely to want huge frame sizes. There is little point sending video much faster than it can be watched, as to do so means that you need lots of buffering in the client and when they decide they've watched enough of the very cute kittens and press stop, you've sent a lot of bytes that were not consumed. OK I know it is actually impossible to stop watching a cute kitten video, but I'm sure there are use-cases to which my argument applies. Video is a use-case where frame size probably needs to be optimised, but not necessarily up. cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 22:37:18 UTC