W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues))

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:45:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW419sZpkqu+oNSbDSUA_SFq9hQry8+5z0fgdDp0EUJjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On 22 July 2014 09:29, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com> wrote:
> If 2 SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE is in SETTINGS, say 0 and N in this order,
> do we have to encode 2 encoding context update for both 0 and N or for just
> N?

This needs clarification, because it's only implicit currently.  You
need to include the lowest and highest values you have seen in
settings when sending the next frame.

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/565
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 16:45:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC