W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues))

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:45:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW419sZpkqu+oNSbDSUA_SFq9hQry8+5z0fgdDp0EUJjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On 22 July 2014 09:29, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com> wrote:
> If 2 SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE is in SETTINGS, say 0 and N in this order,
> do we have to encode 2 encoding context update for both 0 and N or for just
> N?

This needs clarification, because it's only implicit currently.  You
need to include the lowest and highest values you have seen in
settings when sending the next frame.

Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 16:45:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC