- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:43:49 +0200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-07-02 09:35, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <53B3AD3A.8020307@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: > >> The reason I ask is that people might start putting ":status" into a >> trailer and expect that to have an effect (it would be nice to have that >> feature, but it wouldn't map to 1.1...). > > It would also be pretty pointless: It would just shift the buffering > responsibility from the server to the client. What I meant is: an *additional* :status (such as in first claiming everything is ok -- 200, then start streaming and failing, and then send a 500 in the trailers). Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 07:44:23 UTC